USPTO serial 73412509
SPEEDCAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPEEDCAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS J. NIKOLAI
THOMAS J NIKOLAI HAUGEN AND NIKOLAI1936 MIDWEST PLZ BLDGMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | THE MANAGEMENT, PRODUCTION, AND PROMOTION OF FISHING COMPETITIONS | ABANDONED | Nov 4, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 1985 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 1985 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 6, 1985 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Mar 7, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 7, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 16, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |