USPTO serial 73413678
CASH MAXIMIZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1386266Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 1986
- Examiner
- MARSH, SHARON
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CASH MAXIMIZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
CHARLOTTE, NC
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randel S. Springer
RANDEL S SPRINGER WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCONE W 4TH STWINSTON SALEM, NC 27101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MONETARY INVESTMENT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 14, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BANKAMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BANKAMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BANKAMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CASH MAXIMIZER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2016 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 11, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 23, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 20, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |