Drawing for SMART VENDER SYSTEM

USPTO serial 73414676

SMART VENDER SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART VENDER SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LARRY S. NIXON

LARRY S NIXON CUSHMAN, DARBY AND CUSHMAN1801 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009REMOTE NON-PROGRAMMABLE MODULAR MONITOR FOR USE IN VENDING MACHINES COMMUNICATING WITH A CENTRAL DATA PROCESSOR COMPUTER THROUGH TELEPHONE LINES FOR CONTINUOUS MONITORING OR ANALYZING DATA FROM REMOTELY SITUATED VENDING MACHINES RELATING TO MACHINE PERFORMANCE, INVENTORY, MONEY FLOW AND THE LIKEABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 27, 1985EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 6, 1985ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 17, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 10, 1984CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 6, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 1984CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 24, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 15, 1984ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 6, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance