USPTO serial 73414962
CHAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O LEAR, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SORA, FROSINONE, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. HARRIS
RICHARD C HARRIS STEVENS DAVIS MILLER & MOSHER515 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 1427ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN INCLUDING SHOES FOR BASKETBALL, TENNIS AND JOGGING, CASUALS, SANDALS, CLOGS, SLIPPERS, THONGS, BOOTS FOR RIDING AND CLIMBING AND SNOW BOOTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 5, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |