USPTO serial 73417558
DOCUFIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1357682Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 3, 1985
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOCUFIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW ROCHELLE, NY
NEW ROCHELLE, NY
CHICAGO, IL
NEW ROCHELLE, NY
NEW ROCHELLE, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FULL-TEXT DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 10, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMANUEL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EMANUEL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.
- Other trademarks owned by EMANUEL DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOCUFIND CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DOCUFIND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 26, 1993 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1991 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 1991 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 1991 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |