Drawing for ROYAL OAK

USPTO serial 73420029

ROYAL OAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL OAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RICHARD H. ZAITLEN

RICHARD H ZAITLEN SPENSLEY HORN JUBAS AND LUBITZ1880 CENTURY PARK ESTE 500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020MIRRORED DOORSABANDONEDAug 18, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 29, 1986EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 9, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 4, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 1984ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 8, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance