Drawing for WE'VE GOT CRAB LEGS

USPTO serial 73420815

WE'VE GOT CRAB LEGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, RON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE'VE GOT CRAB LEGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WARD BROWN

WARD BROWN BEACH AND BROWN3107 EASTLAKE AVE ESEATTLE, WA 98102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESABANDONEDDec 31, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 20, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 4, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1986CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 10, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 1985ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 3, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1984ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 24, 1984ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance