Drawing for OMN I WARE

USPTO serial 73421265

OMN I WARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OMN I WARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ralph R. Barnard

RALPH R BARNARD509 CITIZENS SAVINGS BANKITHACA, NY 14850UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer Aided Instructional Equipment-Namely, Interactive Pre-Recorded Computer Programs and Video ProgramsABANDONEDDec 10, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 1985ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 10, 1985OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 26, 1984OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 31, 1984PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 1984NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 1984CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance