USPTO serial 73422353
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FIRENZE, IT
FIRENZE, IT
FIRENZE, IT
EMILIO PUCCI PERFUMES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by EMILIO PUCCI PERFUMES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 14, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1989 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 3, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1984 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1983 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1983 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1983 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |