USPTO serial 73422960
PRO-CUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1899300Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 1995
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO-CUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HALTOM CITY, TX
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
HURST, TX
ROANOKE, TX
ROANOKE, TX
HALTOM CITY, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samantha M. Quimby
Samantha M. Quimby Frost Brown Todd LLC301 East Fourth Street3300 Great American TowerCincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | HAIR STYLING AND CUTTING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HAWKINS PRO-CUTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RPC ACQUISITION CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by HAWKINS PRO-CUTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRO-CUTS
- Other trademarks owned by PRO-CUTS
- Other trademarks owned by HAWKINS PRO-CUTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRO-CUTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 13, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 14, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 1, 2013 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 1995 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CU.D | CONCURRENT USE DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1987 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 1987 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 1985 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 1985 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 24, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 4, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |