USPTO serial 73423105
OPTOMETRY GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 23, 1985
- Examiner
- HANNON, MARY
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPTOMETRY GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARVEY KAYE
HARVEY KAYE LALOS LEEDS KEEGAN MARSH BENTZEN & KAYE900 SEVENTEENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | EYE EXAMINATION SERVICES, OPTICAL AND OPHTHALMIC PRESCRIPTION SERVICES, DISPENSING OF OPTICAL AND [ OPHTALMIC LENS ] * OPHTHALMIC LENSES * AND RELATED EYE CARE SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 11, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1991 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 1986 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 30, 1985 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1985 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 24, 1985 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1985 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 9, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |