USPTO serial 73424198
MANHATTAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANHATTAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERNEST I. GIFFORD
ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD VANOPHEM SHERIDAN & SPRINKLE280 N WOODWARDSTE 210BIRMINGHAM, MI 48011Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COOKIES | ABANDONED | Jan 10, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 14, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 24, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1984 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |