USPTO serial 73424262
MONEY SAVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONEY SAVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GREGORY J. LAVORGNA
GREGORY J LAVORGNA SEIDEL, GONDA & GOLDHAMMER, PCSTE 1800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | PROMOTIONAL GAME CARDS. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 30, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 8, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |