USPTO serial 73424665
EPIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICHOLAS J. SEAY
NICHOLAS J SEAY ISAKSEN, LATHROP, ESCH, HART & CLARK122 W WASHINGTON AVE STE 1000P O BOX 1507MADISON, WI 53701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER TIME-DRIVEN RELATIONAL DATA BASE PROGRAMS AND RELATED DOCUMENTATION, ALL SOLD TOGETHER AS A UNIT, FOR USE IN DATA BASE MANAGEMENT, GENERATION OF REPORTS, AND USER QUERIES, PARTICULARLY ADAPTED FOR USE IN DATA MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING BY HEALTH CARE FACILITIES SUCH AS HOSPITALS AND CLINICS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 21, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 1985 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 19, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |