Drawing for COMPUTER SONAR

USPTO serial 73426052

COMPUTER SONAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERSKINE KATHRYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTER SONAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL H. JOHNSON

PAUL H JOHNSON HEAD, JOHNSON & STEVENSON228 W 17TH PLTULSA, OK 74119UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SONAR APPARATUS FOR DETECTING THE DEPTH OF WATER AND OBJECTS, INCLUDING FISH IN THE WATERABANDONEDNov 1, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 1990ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 29, 1989EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 24, 1989CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 20, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 3, 1987EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 31, 1987EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 8, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 21, 1986CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 15, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 10, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 16, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 1984CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 5, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance