USPTO serial 73427429
VCS VIDEO CONTROL SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VCS VIDEO CONTROL SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gordon D. Schmidt
GORDON D SCHMIDT SCHMIDT JOHNSON HOVEY & WILLIAMS1400 MERCANTILE BANK TWR1101 WALNUT STKANSAS CITY, MO 64106Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Touch-Sensitive Screen Apparatus for Video Display Units, Interface Units Therefor, and Microcomputer and Microprocessor Control Systems | ABANDONED | Apr 25, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1985 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 1985 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 20, 1985 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 1984 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1983 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |