Drawing for MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTER

USPTO serial 73427773

MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIUS J. JASON

MARIUS J JASON FELFE & LYNCH805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016A PERIODICALLY ISSUED REFERENCE BOOK CONTAINING INFORMATION ON MEDICAL PRODUCTS AND SUPPLIERS THEREOFABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 13, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 22, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 17, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 31, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 10, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 11, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 1985CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 17, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 25, 1985CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 17, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance