USPTO serial 73428212
SEPTOSONIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEPTOSONIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
75008 PARIS, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERARD J. WEISER
WEISER, STAPLER & SPIVAK, PC1510 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUTOMATIC APPARATUS FOR CLEANING BY ULTRASONIC WAVES DETACHABLE PROTHESIS APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENT OR DEVICES USED IN THE DENTAL/DENTO FACIAL FIELD | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1985 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 26, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 30, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 19, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |