USPTO serial 73428833
JUNO VALUE ANALYSIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUNO VALUE ANALYSIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. PAUL BURD
L PAUL BURD BURD BARTZ AND GUTENKAUF1300 FOSHAY TWRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CUSTOM PLASTIC MOLDING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | CUSTOM PLASTIC MOLDING SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY ADVISORY SERVICES AND SEMINARS DEALING WITH PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED IN PLASTIC MOLDING, INCLUDING MATERIAL SELECTION, COMPONENT AND TOOL DESIGN, EQUIPMENT CHOICE, AND MAXIMUM ECONOMIC UTILIZATION OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JUNO TOOL AND PLASTIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named JUNO VALUE ANALYSIS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1977 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |