USPTO serial 73429013
DANIEL JOUVANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1400833Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DANIEL JOUVANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
56340 CARNAC, FR
BOULOGNE-BILLANCOURT, FR
LA GACILLY, FR
BOULOGNE-BILLANCOURT, FR
BOULOGNE-BILLANCOURT, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HENRY W. LEEDS
Bruce S. Londa Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A.875 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | FACE, NECK AND BODY LOTIONS; NIGHT CREAMS; DAY CREAMS, ANTI-WRINKLE CREAMS; SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS - NAMELY, MILKS, LOTIONS, CLEANSING LOTIONS, JELLIES, OILS, CLEANSING CREAMS, MOISTURIZING AND REVITALISING CREAMS; FACE NOURISHING AND SKIN MOISTURIZING CREAMS AND LOTIONS; VEGETAL PEELING FACE SKIN MASKS; [ SUN CREAMS, SUN OILS; SUN LOTIONS; AFTER-SUN SOOTHING MILKS; DEPILATORY CREAMS; BODY DEODORANTS; SPRAY AND GEL LIQUIDS FOR HAIR, ] HAIR SHAMPOOS, CREAMY HAIR SHAMPOOS, DRY HAIR SHAMPOOS, AFTER-SHAMPOO CONDITIONERS, [ HAIR LOTIONS; SHAVING FOAMS; SHAVING CREAMS; ] PRE-SHAVE AND AFTER-SHAVE MILKS AND LOTIONS; ;[ SHAVING SOAPS; TOILET WATERS, FLORAL-SCENTED WATERS; ] BODY TONIC WATERS; [EAU DE COLOGNE; REFRESHER SACHETS; ] PERFUMES; [ FOAMING BATH GEL; BATH OILS; TOILET SOAPS; SUBSTANCES FOR CLEANING TEETH AND GUMS; MOUTHWASH; MAKE-UP - NAMELY, MOISTURIZING FOUNDATION CREAM, FOUNDATION CREAMS, BLUSHERS, BLUSHER STICKS, EYE-BROW PENCIL, EYE CRAYONS, EYE SHADOWS, LIQUID AND POWDER EYE-LINER, MASCARA, POWDER, ] LIP-STICKS, LIP GLOSS, [ BLEMISH CONCEALER STICKS, ] EYE MAKE-UP REMOVER, [ NAIL POLISH, NAIL POLISH BASE COAT, NAIL POLISH REMOVER, REVITALISING LOTIONS FOR NAILS, TALCUM POWDER, EYE MAKE-UP REMOVER GEL, ] SKIN-CARE PHIALS FOR RESTORING THE TISSUE OF THE SKIN BY STIMULATION OF CELL RENEWAL; AND SLIMMING LOTIONS AND CREAMS FOR MASSAGE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOUVANCE CREATION
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHER, DANIEL
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHER PARTICIPATIONS
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHER, DANIEL
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHER, DANIEL
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named DANIEL JOUVANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 22, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 21, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1983 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |