Drawing for NATIONAL FOOSBALL LEAGUE

USPTO serial 73429572

NATIONAL FOOSBALL LEAGUE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1532473Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 28, 1989
Examiner
SPARROW, MARY
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIONAL FOOSBALL LEAGUE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS W. SECREST

THOMAS W SECREST1023 N E 62NDSEATTLE, WA 98115UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
200INDICATING MEMBERSHIP IN THE NATIONAL FOOSBALL LEAGUESECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 27, 1990CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 1990C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jul 11, 1989PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 28, 1989R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 14, 1988CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 10, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1987CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 6, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 1986UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 18, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 16, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 1986JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 14, 1986EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 24, 1986PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 22, 1986PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 1986ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 28, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance