USPTO serial 73429850
MINT KRISPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 11, 1985
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MINT KRISPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD P. DOYLE, JR.
RICHARD P DOYLE JR FLEHR HOHBACH TEST ALBRITTON & HERBERTSTE 3400FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CANDY * NAMELY, THIN WAFERS, SOLD AND OFFERED FOR SALE ONLY THROUGH RETAIL SHOPS OWNED BY REGISTRANT, WHERE REGISTRANT'S CONFECTIONARY AND NUT PRODUCTS ARE SOLD, MAIL ORDER DIRECTLY FROM REGISTRANT, AND THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL SALES DIRECT FROM REGISTRANT TO BUSINESSES, AND NOT THROUGH ANY RETAIL OUTLETS EXCEPT REGISTRANT'S COMPANY-OWNED STORES * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 1991 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 29, 1991 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1989 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 1989 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1988 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 16, 1988 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1986 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1985 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 26, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |