USPTO serial 73430507
COATES 50/50
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 14, 1986
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COATES 50/50?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD J. LEHRMAN
RONALD J LEHRMAN WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | PRINTING INKS, PRINTING PASTE FOR REPRODUCTION, DRIERS AND RETARDERS, ALL FOR PRINTING INKS; BRONZING LIQUIDS AND GOLD LEAF, ALL FOR USE IN PRINTING PROCESSES; ENAMELS (IN THE NATURE OF PAINT); LAQUERS; AND VARNISHES (OTHER THAN INSULATING VARNISH) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1980 |
| 016 | PRINTED COLOR GUIDES PUBLISHED IN BOUND FORM; COLOR CARDS; COLORED PAPER; COLORED PENS; AND COLORED MARKERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1980 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COATES BROTHERS PLC
- Other trademarks owned by COATES BROTHERS PLC
- Other trademarks owned by COATES BROTHERS PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named COATES 50/50
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1992 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 14, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1985 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1985 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |