USPTO serial 73431321
SUNDOWNER DRAUGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNDOWNER DRAUGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE L. ADAMS
BRUCE L ADAMS BURNS, LOBATO & ADAMS84 WILLIAM STSTE 1000NEW YORK, NY 10038Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | BEER, ALE AND PORTER | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1985 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 1985 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 26, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1984 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 25, 1984 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 31, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |