USPTO serial 73431655
PEPPINO'S PIZZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEPPINO'S PIZZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. PEARCE
JAMES W PEARCESTE 1110105 EACT 4TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CHICKEN AND CHILI FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | ABANDONED | Jul 20, 1981 |
| 030 | PASTA, PIZZA AND SANDWICHES FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | ABANDONED | Jul 20, 1981 |
| 032 | BEER AND SOFT DRINKS FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | ABANDONED | Jul 20, 1981 |
| 039 | DELIVERY SERIVCES | ABANDONED | Jul 20, 1981 |
| 042 | CARRY-OUT SALES | ABANDONED | Jul 20, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PEPPINO'S PIZZA
- Other trademarks owned by PEPPINE'S PIZZA DELIVERY OF CINCINNATI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PEPPINO'S PIZZA
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |