USPTO serial 73431900
PORTAVIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PORTAVIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRY M. WEISS
HARRY M WEISS4204 N BROWN AVESCOTTSDALE, AZ 85251UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC VIDEO EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | Aug 2, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 17, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 20, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 18, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1983 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |