USPTO serial 73432067
GAS SNIFFER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAS SNIFFER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT C. FABER
REVCO PRODUCTS441 E COLUMBINE AVE UNIT DSANTA ANA, CA 92707UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A GAS DETECTOR FOR USE IN RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, MOTOR HOMES, AND HOMES TO DETECT LEAKAGE OF PROPANE, BUTANE, CARBON MONOXIDE, GASOLINE FUMES AND OTHER DANGEROUS GASES, AND FOR SOUNDING AN AUDIBLE ALARM WHEN A DANGEROUS GAS LEVEL HAS BEEN REACHED, THE DEVICE EMPLOYING A SEMICONDUCTOR CONDUCTIVITY TYPE OF DETECTOR | ABANDONED | Jun 3, 1977 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 1985 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 1984 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 18, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |