USPTO serial 73432444
THE SECOND GENERATION OF FRIED CHICKEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE SECOND GENERATION OF FRIED CHICKEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE R. BROWN
LAURENCE R BROWN408 CRYSTAL PLZ ONE2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FROZEN, PRECOOKED POULTRY ENTREES | ABANDONED | May 25, 1983 |
| 035 | FOR SERVICES IN PROVIDING PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION, SALES AND POINT OF CONSUMPTION MATERIALS AND DISPLAYS AND POST-DELIVERY FOOD PRODUCT PREPARATION TECHNOLOGY FOR POULTRY ENTREES THAT ARE MARKETED AND SERVED BY OTHERS | ABANDONED | May 25, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |