Drawing for HEARTY BASKET

USPTO serial 73432723

HEARTY BASKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEARTY BASKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT V. JAMBOR

ROBERT V JAMBOR HAIGHT, HOFELDT, DAVIS & JAMBOR3614 MID CONTINENTAL PLZ55 E MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESABANDONEDMar 1, 1976

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 12, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 12, 1987EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 16, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 16, 1985CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 11, 1985JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 26, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 25, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance