USPTO serial 73433061
EMPIRE NATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, JERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMPIRE NATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD NATTER
HOWARD NATTER NATTER & NATTER25 W 43 STNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | KOSHER PROVISIONS, NAMELY; BEEF KNOCKWURST, BEEF SAUSAGE, STUFFED DERMA, BEEF SALAMI RING, BEEF FRANKFURTERS, BEEF BOLOGNA, COOKED CORNED BEEF BRISKET, COOKED CORNED BEEF TONGUE, VEAL AND BEEF SAUSAGE, CORNED BEEF TONGUE, CORNED BEEF BRISKET, PASTRAMI, ROAST BEEF, LIVERWURST, COOKED UNCURED BEEF SAUSAGE, BEEF HAMBURGERS, FRESH BRISKET, SKIRT STEAK, STEW MEAT AND BEEF SHORT RIBS | ABANDONED | Oct 14, 1969 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |