Drawing for AUDIO SONIC

USPTO serial 73433396

AUDIO SONIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUDIO SONIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID TOREN

KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009STEREO RADIOS, STEREO CASSETTE TAPE RECORDERS, TELEPHONES, RADIOS, CLOCK RADIOS, CAR RADIOS, GRAMOPHONES, RADIO GRAMOPHONE COMBINATIONS, AMPLIFIERS (TUNERS), AUDIO TAPE AND CASSETTE RECORDERS, HEADPHONES, MICROPHONES, SPEAKER BOXES, TELEVISION SETS, AUDIO CASSETTES, CABLES, WALKIE TALKIES AND INTERCOMS, AND AC ADAPTERS.ABANDONEDJul 1, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 10, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 10, 1985EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Sep 27, 1985CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 3, 1985CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 14, 1985DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 29, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 17, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance