USPTO serial 73433476
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD T. GUTTMAN
RICHARD T GUTTMANSQ D COMPANYEXECUTIVE PLZPALATINE, IL 60067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ELECTRICAL JOINT COMPOUND | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1976 |
| 007 | HYDERAULICALLY OPERATED COMPRESSION TOOLS FOR ATTACHING DEFORMABLE METEL CONNECTORS TO ELECTRIC CABLE FOR USE ON HIGH VOLTAGE POWER TRANSMISSION LINES | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1976 |
| 009 | COMPRESSION CONNECTORS, SUSPENSION CLAMPS, POLE LINE HARDWARE, ELECTRICAL POWER LINE AND TOWER AND HARDWARE NAMELY, ELECRICAL TRANSMISSION ASSEMBLIES, ELECTRICAL TERMINALS, COUPLERS, TEES, ELECTRICAL BUS SUPPORTS, ELECTRICAL STUD CONNECTORS, WELDMENT CONNECTORS AND ELECTRICAL GROUND CLAMPS FOR USE ON HIGH VOLTAGE POWER TRANSMISSION LINES FOR USE IN THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF HIGH VOLTAGE POWER TRANSMISSION LINES OF ELECTRIC UTILITIES | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1976 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1987 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 10, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |