USPTO serial 73434026
MUDVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MUDVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLEN M. KRASS
ALLEN M KRASS2855 COOLIDGE, STE 210TROY, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | SUCTION MACHINES FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES AND PARTS THEREFOR. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1987 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 26, 1987 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1985 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 3, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1985 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |