USPTO serial 73434120
REVELATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHALLANT, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REVELATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE E. LILLING
BRUCE E LILLING LILLING & GREENSPAN123 MAIN STWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOOS AND HAIR COLORING | ABANDONED | Jun 6, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 11, 1985 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 16, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |