USPTO serial 73434268
KEN'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 1987
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KEN'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tulsa, OK, US
Tulsa, OK, US
Ken's Restaurant Systems, Inc.
Tulsa, OK, US
Ken's Restaurant Systems, Inc.
Tulsa, OK, US
Ken's Restaurant Systems, Inc.
Tulsa, OK, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK G KACHIGIAN
MARK G KACHIGIAN HEAD, JOHNSON & KACHIGIAN, P.C.228 W 17TH PLTULSA, OK 74119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PIZZA RESTAURANT SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAZZIO'S CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MAZZIO'S, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ken's Restaurant Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ken's Restaurant Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ken's Restaurant Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KEN'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 27, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 20, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 1992 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1977 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |