USPTO serial 73434335
MICROSENTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROSENTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur A. Jacobs
ARTHUR A JACOBS TRACHTMAN, JACOBS & BECKSTE 1908, PENNSYLVANIA BLDG1500 CHESTNUT STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Programmable Code-Controlled Access Terminals for Computers | ABANDONED | Jun 8, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 1, 1987 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 1985 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 1984 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1984 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 1, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |