USPTO serial 73435010
A LA CARTE AWARDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 1985
- Examiner
- SKORO, LINDA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with A LA CARTE AWARDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Minneapolis, MN
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLEN E SCHUMANN
GLEN E SCHUMANN MOSS & BARNETT90 S 7TH ST STE 4800WELLS FARGO CTRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES DIRECTED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF PERSONNEL MOTIVATION PLANS INVOLVING THE PROMOTION OF THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE ISSUANCE AND REDEMPTION OF [ REDEEMABLE COUPONS ] * GIFT AND AWARD CERTIFICATES * | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 28, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHOENECKERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Business Incentives, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BUSINESS INCENTIVES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Business Incentives, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named A LA CARTE AWARDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 1991 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1988 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 25, 1988 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jun 30, 1988 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 26, 1988 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1988 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1984 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1984 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1984 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |