Drawing for IFF'S NEW FLAVOR SYSTEMS BRING BACK NATURE'S FRESHNESS

USPTO serial 73435230

IFF'S NEW FLAVOR SYSTEMS BRING BACK NATURE'S FRESHNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IFF'S NEW FLAVOR SYSTEMS BRING BACK NATURE'S FRESHNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARTHUR L. LIBERMAN

ARTHUR L LIBERMAN INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES INC521 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ADVERTISEMENT FOR ADVERTISING ITS SERVICES IN PROVIDING FLAVORS TO THE FOOD AND BEVERAGE INDUSTRIESABANDONEDJun 22, 1983

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 1984ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 31, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1983CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1983DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance