USPTO serial 73435472
REMINGTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REMINGTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES R. MIRANDA
CHARLES R MIRANDA60 MAIN STBRIDGEPORT, CT 06602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | BELTS USED WITH CLOTHING | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |