USPTO serial 73437181
PRO KENNEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CONN, WILLIAM A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRO KENNEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TAICHUNG HSIEN, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SIEGEL
JAMES E SIEGEL LACKENBACH, SIEGEL, MARZULLO, PESTA& ARONSONONE CHASE RD PENTHOUSE STESCARSDALE, NY 10583Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TENNIS RACKETS, SQUASH RACKETS, RACKETBALL RACKETS, BADMINTON RACKETS AND FISHING RODS | ABANDONED | Sep 8, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1984 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |