USPTO serial 73438026
GIRINDUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 1985
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GIRINDUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FRIBOURG, CH
1700 FRIBOURG, CH
1700 FRIBOURG, CH
51427 BERGISCH GLADBACH, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLIFFORD W. BROWNING
CLIFFORD W BROWNING KRIEG DEVAULT LLPONE INDIANA SQ STE 2800INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICALS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PHARMACEUTICALS, [ PHOTOGRAPHIC DEVELOPERS, PHOTOGRAPHIC BATHS AND PHOTOGRAPHIC TREATMENT OF FILMS, ] VETERINARY PHARMACEUTICALS, [ WINDOW CLEANING PREPARATIONS, ] COSMETICS, [ HAIR SPRAYS AND DETERGENTS; CHEMICALS USED AS FLAME RETARDANTS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PLASTICS; CHEMICAL SOLVENTS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ACRYLIC RESINS AND LACQUERS; CHEMICALS USED AS PRESERVATIVES IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY; CHEMICALS USED AS FLAVOR AND FRAGRANCE ENHANCERS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF FOOD AND COSMETICS; CHEMICALS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PERFUMES ; NITROMETHANE USED AS A FUEL ADDITIVE ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | [ WOOD PRESERVATIVES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | [ ESSENTIAL OILS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PERFUMES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | [ NITROMETHANE USED AS A FUEL ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | [ TUBERCULOSTATIC PHARMACEUTICALS AND PHARMACEUTICALS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ALLERGIES; BACTERICIDES USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF DRILLING MUDS; CHEMICAL BIOCIDES USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CUTTING OILS AND DEODORANT SOAPS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GIRINDUS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GIRINDUS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GIRINDUS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GIRINDUS AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named GIRINDUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2006 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 1995 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 17, 1991 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 1991 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 22, 1991 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1984 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |