USPTO serial 73439003
POSTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
KYUNG SANG BOOK-DO, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M. SLATTERY
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH301 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 208THFALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | STEEL AND IRON PLATE, IRON WIRE, STEEL AND IRON PIPE, AND STAINLESS STEEL PIPE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1986 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 13, 1986 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 1986 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 25, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1986 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 1985 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1985 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1985 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 25, 1985 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 25, 1985 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |