Drawing for STAINED GLASS OVERLAY

USPTO serial 73439428

STAINED GLASS OVERLAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAINED GLASS OVERLAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT E. STRAUSS

ROBERT E STRAUSS1600 N BROADWAYSTE 400SANTA ANA, CA 92706

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039THE SERVICES OF PROCESSING WINDOWS TO SIMULATE STAINED AND LEADED GLASS AND RENDERING TECHNICAL AID AND ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF STAINED AND LEADED GLASS PROCESSING OUTLETS.ABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 1985EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 23, 1985ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 19, 1985EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 21, 1985CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 17, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance