Drawing for VOICE/LINK

USPTO serial 73439587

VOICE/LINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOICE/LINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CARL B. HILLIARD, JR.

CARL B HILLIARD JR2550 FIFTH AVESTE 5SAN DIEGO, CA 92103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SENDING SERVICES BY WAY OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, MESSAGE FORWARDING SERVICES, MESSAGE PRINTING, AND OTHER DIGITAL ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SERVICES, AND MICROWAVE COMMUNICATION SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 1986EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 28, 1986ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 1985CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 3, 1985CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1984JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 23, 1984EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 26, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 1983EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance