USPTO serial 73440083
COMPUTEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 15, 1985
- Examiner
- SKORO, LINDA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPUTEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ROCKVILLE, MD
NEW HAVEN, CT
ROCKVILLE, MD
REDMOND, WA
ROCKVILLE, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM F. LAWRENCE
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER, LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING SEMINARS ABOUT USING COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 17, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTEACH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPU-TEACH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTEACH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPU-TEACH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTEACH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COMPUTEACH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 1992 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 11, 1991 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1985 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 1985 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1985 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1985 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 1985 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 1985 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |