USPTO serial 73441345
MILLIMETER WAVE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 1985
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MILLIMETER WAVE TECHNOLOGY, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. WOLFSON
DAVID M WOLFSON SMITH, MITCHELL AND MITCHELL131 TRINITY PLDECATUR, GA 30030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RADAR SYSTEMS, RADAR DETECTORS, AIRCRAFT ICE DETECTION SYSTEMS, MISSILE TARGET SIMULATOR SYSTEMS, RADOMES, FREQUENCY GENERATORS, AND CALIBRATION DEVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 19, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1992 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 20, 1985 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 23, 1985 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1984 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 1984 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |