USPTO serial 73441864
AIR GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 1986
- Examiner
- WENDEL, HELEN R.
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIR GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Atlanta, GA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
WATERBURY, CT
AIR GUARD CONTROL OF CANADA LIMITED
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Other trademarks owned by AIR GUARD CONTROL OF CANADA LIMITED
Waterbury, CT
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric J. Hanson
Eric J. Hanson Polsinelli PC1201 West Peachtree Street NWSuite 1100Atlanta, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ MANURE TREATMENT CHEMICALS; HUMAN WASTE TREATMENT CHEMICALS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | [ LIVESTOCK SPRAY MARKING PAINT SOLD IN AEROSOL CONTAINERS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | [ INSECT REPELLENTS AND INSECTICIDES AND ] DEODORIZING, SANITIZING AND GERMICIDAL PREPARATIONS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ELECTRIC INSECT KILLING APPARATUS; APPARATUS FOR DISPENSING THE CONTENTS OF A PRESSURIZED AEROSOL CONTAINER IN DISCRETE VOLUMES AT PRE-DETERMINED INTERVALS; ][ ULTRASONIC RODENT REPELLERS; OZONE GENERATORS; AND AUTOMATIC INSECTICIDE FOGGERS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | [ MILK FILTERS AND MILK FILTER DISPENSERS FOR DAIRY FARM USE ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | [ ANIMAL MARKING CRAYON STICKS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | [ INSECT TRAPS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMREP IP HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AIR GUARD CONTROL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AIR GUARD CONTROL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by AIR GUARD CONTROL OF CANADA LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AIR GUARD CONTROL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AIR GUARD CONTROL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named AIR GUARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2024 | NCS7 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 7 SURRENDER EMAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 28, 2017 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 1986 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1985 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1985 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1985 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1985 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1985 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1984 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1984 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 23, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1984 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |