USPTO serial 73445006
SURGICOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SURGICOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK E. BOLAND
PATRICK E BOLAND HAUCK, ANSORGE, KRENTZ & BOLANDTRADEMARK OPERATIONS, 40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | STERILE AND NON-STERILE SURGICAL PRODUCTS-- NAMELY, PACKING GAUZE, TUBULAR STOCKINETTE FOR USE AS A DRESSING AND FOR WRAPPING COTTON, ANTIEMBOLISM STOCKINGS, COTTON TIP APPLICATORS, DENTAL ROLL FOR ORAL SURGERY, STERILE RUBBER BANDS, SURGICAL TAPE, STERILE SAFETY PINS, STERILE AIRWAYS, CAST PADDING, MUSLIN ROLL, CAPILLARY TUBES; TOURNIQUE; MEDICAL DEVICES FOR USE IN RESPIRATION THERAPY -- NAMELY, DISPOSABLE MOUTHPIECES, AEROSOL AND VENTILATOR ADAPTORS AND AEROSOL TUBING; OXYGGEN CANOPY; BAGS FOR USE IN STERILIZATION PROCEDURES AND AS DUST COVERS | ABANDONED | May 31, 1974 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1984 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 1984 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |