Drawing for ALKALINITY PLUS

USPTO serial 73445671

ALKALINITY PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHALLANT, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALKALINITY PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. M. Fernandez

A M FERNANDEZ FREILICH HORNBAKER WASSERMAN ROSEN& FERNANDEZ, STE 143410960 WILSHIRE BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90024

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical for pH Level Control in Swimming PoolsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 1985ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 1984PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 1984NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 27, 1984CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 1984CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 18, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance