Drawing for PACIFIC FRESH

USPTO serial 73445740

PACIFIC FRESH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1382764Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 11, 1986
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACIFIC FRESH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID J. BREZNER

DAVID J BREZNER FLEHR HOHBACH TEST ALBRITTON & HERBERTSTE 3400 FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042RESTAURANT SERVICESEXPIREDApr 24, 1979

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2006CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 29, 1993PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Dec 7, 1992RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Jun 2, 1992PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Feb 11, 1992815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 11, 1986R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 19, 1985PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 1985NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 1985CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 9, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1985CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 1985CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 1984CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 1984CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 1984CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 1984DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance